| Factors of Rapid Development |
|
Therefore, if you know that you need rapid development but are unsure what part of the business needs to be impacted, start with the following considerations.
The best solution is a perfect combination of scheduling performance and cost. However, sometimes, rapid development is simply not an option. For instance, a company may have a new product that they want to rollout but one week before launch date, a new law was passed that puts things on hold or perhaps an unexpected layoff was announced, which cut back on the labor needed to execute. However, even with challenges, rapid development has to weigh the odds of good versus bad. Again, people need to consider whether it would be okay to leapfrog a competitor, beating that company to the punch with a new product and/or service, knowing there could be change, or is it better to wait and get a near-perfect or perfect product/service out the first time. If you look at computer software companies, they launch early to stay competitive all the time. Then, when a flaw is discovered because of rapid development, they release a patch or new version of the program. This happens all the time and in today’s society, it is not only expected, but actually accepted by most people. Of course, there will be some that find rapid development a negative thing. One of the demands associated with rapid development comes from business owners or top management who push to get things out the door. The key here is that the people, developers, manufacturers, engineers, and technicians doing the work, need to communicate better with company management. For instance, the owner may be saying to get the new product out the door but after having a conversation with the developer of that product, they realize it would be a much better option to wait until the product is perfect, ultimately saving the company money. Therefore, while there is ongoing pressure for rapid development, the team working the project needs to be able to stand up and show business owners and top management the reasons it makes more sense to take a little longer for rollout. Known as “lookalike rapid development”, this reference is one where a specific product/service appears at first glance to need a quick launch but then after careful consideration, it is found that speed is actually the secondary priority. To ensure rapid development occurs the right way, the following factors are crucial.
Add as favourites (87) | Quote this article on your site
|
||||||||
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
user programs instance java tests number project company type source application development operating person projects testing systems time requirements education open programmers support option customer create needs content programming customers domain developers program product good developer design work cost solution management code practices applications important language employees process name data computer specific business needed